The road from positive efficacy findings to filing for IND (Investigational New Drug)
application is arduous, time-consuming, and costly. Many early-stage drug-discovery
teams, particularly at small organizations and in academic programs, have insufficient
experience on how to best travel this road, so as to get to IND as fast as possible,
with the least expenditure, and with a compound that is most likely to be successful.
Such teams can benefit tremendously from the advice of a drug-development consultant.
The technological changes in preclinical drug development that began in the late
1990s have dramatically changed the path to IND, and these changes are continuing,
especially with regard to new FDA advisories about
drug-drug interactions
and safety testing of drug metabolites.
Apredica's expertise is in moving drug-discovery programs from the point of efficacy
to the point of initiating the GLP studies required for regulatory filings.
Our experience
has been that many drug-discovery teams are unintentionally misguided by the directions
provided by investors because those directions are based on the milestones required for
achieving a positive return on investment and not on the milestones required for making a
drug-development program successful. On the surface these milestones would seem to be just
different markers on the same path, but these differences in how the path is marked cause
substantively different paths to be taken from one milestone to the next. For example,
because first-in-human studies are such an important investment milestone, drug-development
teams tend to be at risk of conducting such studies prematurely, encountering failures that
could have easily and inexpensively been avoided through more-thorough preclinical research.